thinking: debate with the right people always advances the goal, even if it sets back a meeting. and topics presented in meetings shouldn’t require 100% alignment beforehand, defeats the point of bringing minds together. to be worthwhile, meetings shouldn’t keep to a schedule.
the idea that hard decisions can be timeboxed and be made inoffensively within an hour is one of the most insane that has gotten reactions
-
-
truly. and yet it’s the default in every calendar...
-
imo less about scheduling for me and more about the revealed belief, that the best decision at any point is knowable, will arrive regardless of path, and will shake out to be obvious given 45 to 55 minutes of discussion and will he ultimately one everyone is comfortable with
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.