really dislike the cb insights peer rank as an answer to this question, horribly outdated— think the most obvious answer is the classic blue chips + vertical specifics with strong portfolio support
I’m not sure this metric actually tracks what you’re looking for, But if you had to: you could start with the CB insights list, weight down for negative preferences (partner removed by scandal, etc.) and upweight based on desirable (gender equality amount gps, etc.)
-
-
I suspect you’d also want to weight for the relative scarcity of the check at the relevant stage. Ex. A sequoia/etc. writing a 200k check into a post YC party round is much less telling then a blue chip growth fund choosing to lead and take a board seat at seed
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.