Ehhhhhh disagree Like, you can find it on crunchbase anyway If anything it’s more clarifying for founders trying to see if they “actually do seed” like they claim / general funding expectations etc... In a network like startup/VC land. The more upfront you are the better imo
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
crunchbase data is so sparse that the exclusion of a fund from round to round is hardly signal-- seems increasingly rare to report any funding details on crunchbase. like sure diligence would of course find out about x fund didn't follow, but no need to yell it to the street
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
I think that’s all fair but I personally like the transparency. So many funds will be like “oh we definitely write seed checks” but it’s actually just once a year and it’s for their friend BUT THEY WANT TO SEE EVERYTHING This creates honesty on both sides
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @socialimpactvc @ImpCapital and
If you primarily write seed and A checks There’s no red flag because you didn’t do the B. Or maybe the timing was off so you couldn’t participate in the A. That’s all cleared in a diligence call This is equally about new relationships as it is about current portfolio no?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
If you write Seed and A and didn’t do the B, could mean you need to raise a bigger fund
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @socialimpactvc @ImpCapital and
With “the Vision Fund” being a thing, I see no reason there can’t be a $100B “Impact Fund”
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
lmao at a saudi wealth fund impact investing
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @socialimpactvc @ImpCapital and
Billions has mislead mepic.twitter.com/F6Wq7bX4AN
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.