and, hey, those same Revolutionaries established a 1st Amendment that covered offensive speech.
nope. Didn't really have democratic means back then to do otherwise, did they.
-
-
by all means stop them from taking those rights away, but to stop free speech to protect free speech?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
yea because using violence to silence free speech isn't an infringement on free speech.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.