@Wikimedia @fuzheado Seem to be OK now. Still a good reminder that we need to decentralize so this can't happen.
-
-
-
@kragen@Wikimedia@brionv Agree - We've been spoiled by excellent uptime of Wikimedia servers, but still not as robust as it could be -
@fuzheado It's going to be a huge technical and social challenge.@Wikimedia@brionv -
@kragen@Wikimedia@brionv What kind of budget would a read-only off-site replica need? Perhaps some grant proposal to prototype this? -
@fuzheado@Wikimedia@brionv Things like Kiwix, WikiReader, and XOWA are already delivering occasionally-updated read-only off-site replicas -
@fuzheado@Wikimedia@brionv Not to mention, of course, http://answers.com , which is handy when Wikipedia's site breaks on mobile. -
@fuzheado@Wikimedia@brionv Of course Answers or WikiReader could still update to an accidentally truncated version or something. -
@fuzheado@Wikimedia@brionv If you could choose to roll back to a previous version of the Wikipedia replica you're using, that would help.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Wikimedia Quick, quick. I can't go cold turkey now!#wikijunkiesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
RIP nut graf RT
@Wikimedia: All Wikimedia sites are experiencing issues due to a network problem. We'll be back up shortly!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
@Wikimedia Hope it will be fixed soon.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
@Wikimedia That's a good thing and we are waiting for the good...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.