Can you provide more detail on this case?
As a judge, Barrett sided against an African American worker in favor of a company’s “separate-but-equal arrangement,” flying in the face of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Now, she’s up for a seat on our nation’s highest court. #SaveSCOTUS #StopBarrettpic.twitter.com/JOoQrjP8FC
-
-
-
Here you go. The case does not say nor imply what
@WhyCourtsMatter claims, but you can decide for yourself.https://twitter.com/hoyagrizzag/status/1013900408027209728 … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Courts matter so organizations like yours can get sued for defamation.
-
A total and complete falsehood.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Instead of "NOT COOL", you should have a pic saying "NOT TRUE"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fake news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Bc they have nothing factual to try to take her down.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Fake news. The court Barrett was on did not even hear the case.
#WhyTruthMatters.#LiberalLogic -
The allegation doesn't even make sense. If the other hysterical critics are correct, Barrett obviously would've ruled that the auto parts store employee had no right to an abortion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.