Cheick's new Schmooveᴮᴸᴹ

yeah these are all related but they're seperate

but they're all being combined to paint an image as a whole. when the pieces don't fit then it doesn't belong together, period.

how do the pieces not fit

i literally fucking explained what the three points were and how they contradicted each others core criticisms. the sum of the points flaws over rule every single argument in favour of being offended at a joke that agrees with the issue we all care about existing.

the second point i claimed police brutality was always topical and the third point doesn't matter cause im focusing on this one joke

okay and my rebuttle is, you're right it's always topical hance the joke was included to begin with. my issue is people taking offence months after its released in a wave of people getting offended at inanimate objects coincidentally using BLM protests to justify.

what, do people have to realize things immediately or else it's invalid?

it's a fucking theatrical film, it doesn't take 4 months to realise something offends you. and you getting offended at my poor wording insinuating you were accusing me of derailing is a great example of how quick offense hits.