Heather Burns

@WebDevLaw

Tech policy wonk for hire. Policy Fellow . Does . WP privacy & cross-CMS privacy teams. Personal tweets. IANAL FFS

GLA/ MCR/ EDI/ LDN/ BFS/ BRX
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @WebDevLaw

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @WebDevLaw

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    27. sij 2018.

    This is a thread for those of you who say coders and developers should take no role in politics. Those of you who watched my talk last year already heard this story. You can hear it again. This was Rene Carmille, and that is a punch card.

    Image of Rene Carmille
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 3 sata

    Tech policy these days is about defending startups & SMEs from heavy-handed legislation which has been crafted entirely around lawmakers' fantasies about seeing Zuck being put in the back of a police car. These people do not care if the whole tech sector is collateral damage.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 3 sata

    When you impose criminal liability on directors for user-generated content posted to their platforms, you make those jobs ones no one in their right mind will take. So the very talent you need to hire to fix UGC issues goes elsewhere instead. Do keep that in mind, baying mobs.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    (1/x) How not to have a debate about the difficulties e2e encryption poses for content review and detection of child sexual abuse online.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    I'm not sure there's a case at all, but "In its current form, encryption would breach Facebook's duty of care for children so the UK government must ensure a new regulator has the power to hold them financially and criminally accountable" from is off the scale.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    And if - as that quote suggests - the measure would be a breach of an existing duty of care, and so would, today, be a tortious act, why are we not seeing applications for an injunction to prevent the implementation of E2EE which the article says are “moving ahead”?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    Indeed, one might find compelling arguments that attempting to minimise interferences with the integrity and surveillance of the content of communications is not only consistent with a duty of care, but supported by the data protection and ePrivacy frameworks.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    I don’t see a particular issue in persuading a court that a platform owes a duty of care to its users - the relationship seems sufficiently “neighbourly” - but what that duty entails, and whether, in offering E2EE, the platform breaches the standard of care, seems questionable.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    If an *existing* duty of care prohibits this, what is it, and what is its relationship to the proposed statutory duty of care? A negligence-based duty, which would sit in parallel to a statutory duty? Or is this a reference not to a legal duty, but something else?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    Unsurprisingly, the Investigatory Powers Act is no longer the main vehicle being cited to attempt to stop providers offering enhanced security and privacy to user communications, but the assertion that it is prohibited by an unreferenced “duty of care”.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. prije 14 sati
    Poništi
  12. 5. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 5. velj

    Every so often I come back to 's brilliant piece on Theresa May's legacy on tech, which we're going to be living with for a long time. Kudos for "a British internet for British people."

    Poništi
  14. 5. velj

    I've been translated into German, which causes the hilarity of me explaining data protection to Germans.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    Great piece from on the inescapable reality that startups can’t afford to ignore political & regulatory developments. The next generation of founders and startups can’t use the same playbook as those that went before

    Poništi
  16. 4. velj

    I will continue to faithfully document the source of my headache here.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 4. velj

    I'm quoted in Euraktiv this morning about why I have a headache.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 3. velj

    Will not make a Brexit joke will not make a Brexit joke will not make a Brexit joke

    Poništi
  19. 3. velj

    Incidentally, if you want to see several years of documentation of the UK's participation in the negotiating process on this law in Europe, fill your boots.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 3. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 3. velj

    Because setting tolerance at a browser level was proposed in the upcoming revision of the actual law which concerns them years ago, then shelved. The UK was a party to that process. Browser settings may now be put back in. But the UK has left the table.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·