WSJ=SJW
-
-
-
@d3pl0rab3l@queenspiderz@bubbazanetti4@denicebradbury@ianrmapes@micropilote Agree - they never covered Bowling Green Massacre -
A surefire sign of SJWs / snowflakes - refusing to talk about the worst tragedy since 9/11
#neverforget - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
#1 workplace tip: keep your pens and pencils in a stick of butter at your desk to facilitate tasty memos.
@ed_retired62@6_Thirteenpic.twitter.com/bKvuoyfYPd
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So many white men in that photo.
-
Did you happen to see the liberal Huffington Post Board room Photo? Where is your racist indignation tweet about that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here is some good advice, take it or leave it, but your future and the nation's rests upon it: TELL THE TRUTH! Don't just print your propaganda (Rupert's Rag), give us all sides of the issues, we are intelligent enough to make up our own minds.
-
-
-
If a guy grabs you, give him The Knee.
-
-
-
You people have lost all credibility propping up
#Trumputin. No wonder you need to “promote.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
So much defensiveness in the comments, in spite of the actual good advice here, much of which can be useful to both men & women. But this especially rang true 2 me: “Even today, men generally seem to have a better understanding of the unwritten rules of the office than women do.”
-
maybe because the rules were designed by and for men?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You lost me at “hello Stanford grad”. There is literally nothing a liberal can say to improve the workplace. Liberals like you are the reason the workplace is such a mess.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
My advice: if Rupert Murdoch buys your media QUIT!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dear WSJ: Why don’t you make the stories that you tweet readable to nonsubscribers? They might be more inclined to subscribe.
-
-
-
WSJ=Fake news
-
-
-
Fact based research would be a solid start. Don’t use any unnamed sources unless you verify by 2-3 independent others. Tell the story as it is without any slant or agenda. Be the eyes and ears of your readers by informing. Assume readers think for themselves.
-
Readers frequently can't think for themselves in a rational manner. Have you read the WSJ comment sections? Holy smokes at least Yahoo comments have wit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.