Give the kids some piece of mind and move on to other shit.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This would make sense if DACA was a law, but it's not... soooo...
-
It wasn't a statute. But it was an official policy position by a federal agency (DHS), which makes it subject to the requirements of a statute (the Administrative Procedure Act) and subject to judicial review (via §706 of the APA).
-
I'm not talking about it's judicial review, I'm talking about the interpretation of the policy ending being unlawful when the policy itself is unlawful to begin with.
-
You said that DACA was not a law. I said that's irrelevant. Now you're saying that it was unlawful to begin with. Which is also irrelevant.
-
Riiiight, so the judicial decision that it's unlawful is irrelevant... do you know what you're even talking about?

-
Yes. It's irrelevant to the issue the court was considering. The lawsuit was not challenging the legality of DACA. It was challenging the administrative process by which DACA was rescinded. That's all. So, the agency's legal reasoning was relevant, but not the legality per se.
-
And part of the administrative process for recension included reasonings of legality finding it " ...did not comply with the [APA] because the Department did not implement it through notice-and-comment rulemaking.” Which is also the challenge against the recension actions.

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also the most absurd! This judge took an oath to uphold the constitution, which woefully he is uneducated about. Time for this judge to step down for violating that oath!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A new legal theory, “continue a law that’s unconstitutional because an unconstitutional law is better than no law at all.” George Orwell’s 1984 can’t beat that reasoning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DACA is illegal. It was implemented by that imbecile Democrats elected, Obama.
-
No court has ruled DACA or
#DACA is illegal, and you are an imbecile for asserting that it is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.