Obviously the wsj will publish fake news to support illegal war in a destroyed country. If USA gov is so worried about people in Syria why they do not open doors to accept refugees scaping Assad's regime? Serious journalism cannot be expected from such corrupt medio #WSJ
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Die Kriegsverbrecher
#USA,#Frankreich und#England gehören vor Gericht gestellt! Die Bombardierung#Syrien s ist völkerrechtswidrig.#Syria#SyriaStrikes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It’s easy to see the spin when the WSJ. Says “some Syrians”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some “Syrians” which are Daesh members
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some rebel terrorists were upset that the strikes were limited and Assad was not killed during the violation of Syrian sovereignty by allied western bullies!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please dear Assad drop sarin on wall street
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Fake news. Bombs falling on your own country is not something anyone loving it and living in it would want.
-
Unless you’re Jewish living in 1940 Nazi Germany, or Syrians getting gas by their own government.
-
I have doubts you get what I meant. There must be alternativea to dropping bombs and creating more destruction. We're lead to belive by politicians influenced by military lobbyists that this is the correct thing to do.
-
The world is done with blanket bombing. The US bombs strategically. Ask yourself, & do your research, are the things that the US bombed, were they anything more than the products of war? If the US destroyed only the chemical weapons plants, is that not what we are looking for?
-
"If". Also, I seem to remember numerous civilian casualties in any war the US has taken part in. Exporting the US type of democracy in the form of bombs, suffering and deaths has also failed many times. Maybe this approach is not the ultimate solution? That's all I'm saying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who are those some? Al Nusra? ISIS? Or those who caged women to use them as human shield?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You mean some “Zionists”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.