Did you really just subject found the only black kid in the picture lmao
-
-
-
Just saw that. They should at least pretend there is no bias
-
I didn't even notice the kid was black until you pointed it out. That's how the majority of people look at color. We don't notice it until someone points it out.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Who me? Where do I get paid to do this I've been doing it for free like an idiot
-
That's how I feel. I get called a bot frequently (there's a website to check http://botcheck.me ) but it's usually by People who can't debate. Shocking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So they can check everyone's ID without making contact or reasonable suspicion/starting an investigation? That doesn't sound particularly legal to me.....
-
It's not illegal for a law enforcement official to check your ID.
-
The 4th amendment says otherwise.
-
I took a constitutional law class, we discussed the 4th Amendment for over a month. That's not what it says. That's not what it means.
-
Well you must have snoozed through your class cause that’s exactly what it means. Police can’t just stop you for no reason and ask for id. They need probable cause.
-
Reasonable suspicion* It's a lower standard, but still a standard.
-
True but most cops don’t even follow that standard.
-
It's not about what cops follow what standards, it's about what is legally permissible. That's what you have to protect yourself from. If a crooked cop does something wrong, good chance you can sue. If you do something wrong to a good cop, you're going down.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a developer in the AI image detection sphere I gotta tell you, the number of false positives is staggering, and if you give it to officers who 'trust the equipment', they are gonna be doing a lot of bad stuff because the robot told them to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“eliminate target immediately. Beep beep boop."

-
"Destroy all humanzzz" blip blop blip blip
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One step closer to
#RobocopThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need a law that once a police officer is on duty there will be no way to disable, turn off or mute the body cam and if it does become disabled, the officer is to return to the station immediately.
-
If you have that little trust for police in the first place, don't call them.
-
Many people don't. And that doesn't mean that people aren't still affected (e.g. killed) by police, even w/out "calling them".
-
I'm doing my part. Still treated like a racist for it.pic.twitter.com/ki61iTsuI4
-
We wouldn't need such a law if there already weren't case after case of police disabling or muting the cameras. My statement is based upon facts and the actions of people. If cameras are issued, they need to be used correctly 100% of the time. Do that and no need for a law.
-
I can't imagine there's any reason for a cop's camera to ever be shut off, aside from nefarious ones.
-
I listed the most common reason already. Rape reporting. If you're raped, do you want to tell your story to a cop and his body camera, so the guys at the station can watch it later? No. So they turn off the camera.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.