When I first saw the image for this article, my brain did not jump to watches…
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/973488860662517761 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Younger generation not interested in much as I see it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
before time runs out, surely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish high quality/luxury watches could be bought for a cheaper price but still last. Anything above $1000 dollars for a watch is hard to do for many millennials.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
stop trashing Jean Claude Von Damme... calling him a ‘Beaver’ is one thing, alluding to some estrogen watch interest is another. I’m calling below the belt on this one. Shame on you SJW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hhhh what !? Younger generations barely can afford living. This industry is second most expensive and pointless after the diamond industry !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.