Why not. It's not like they believe in climate change.
-
-
-
Can’t figure what they really believe but I think all they care about is more money for now and let someone else worry about our planet
#ecological#disaster
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“In order to achieve energy dominance through responsible energy production, we need smart regulations not punitive regulations. We believe this proposed rule strikes that balance and will allow job growth in rural America.” Joe Balash Asst. Sec'y Land and Minerals Managementpic.twitter.com/aqj1feZCX8
-
Unfortunately they are mistaken. The best place to charge the cost of the environmental impact is when it is being drilled, mined, etc that provides the incentive to keep air and water clean and to sequester carbon
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course they are. We'll be lucky to be able to breath at all by the time this idiot is done.
-
Well later we will just have to pay the wealthy corporations to provide us with clean water, breathable air and food. Works for them. They like the serf and lord model
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pathetic!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is called a free market self regulating without government interference. This is how it is supposed to work
-
Actually it’s called a “free-rider” problem in which private industry can produce more cheaply if they let society as a whole pay for the environmental impact. That means a future with higher taxes for all and possibly a food, potable water and breathable air shortage
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.