-
-
-
As he was starting an investigation into Russia's meddling in the presidential election, FBI Agent Peter Strzok made clear how he felt about his target http://on.wsj.com/2EAgo4j pic.twitter.com/3jiQRhAUiD
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is this invasion of their privacy allowed? Don't they have any rights? Refuse to read this peeping tom article.
-
Hahahaha
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For the love of god, who cares, they have opinions like everyone else. The fact that a slimy senator felt the need to probe into their personal lives, proving absolutely nothing is shameful You have to wonder if Nunes and Trump are in bed together.
-
I dont want to assume which one was the pee-er and the pee-ee.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually, they disliked everyone. AND they're allowed to have opinions. NO evidence that opinion altered or affected the work.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sure, he loved her. That’s why he reopened the investigation into her emails
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#WallStreetJournal, This article is why I will NEVER buy or subscribe to your paper; even if I think they both should be fired.#GodHATESsinpic.twitter.com/xl7LHQCKLY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More surprising would be to even find one person who likes Trump, in the State Department.
-
On in any department for that matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can we please see the texts and emails of all Congressional representatives during the Benghazi hearings?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So was Ken Starr totally unbiased, or nah?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A thousand texts about nothing.
#Sigh - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.