Why? Federer lost to so many others! Just because he is from
, doesn't mean Roger's loss will be catastrophic to him! Baseless headline! Change it.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Gutless choker. Should have finished match, hollow victory for Federer who had the shits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WRONG! Not by a long shot. It's not even Wimbledon for starters. Roger lost to lower ranked players before (Sergiy Stakhovsky 116 at Wimb.13). Chung is 21 Federer 36. Chun been known to players for some time perhaps not personally. Chung also won next gen finals '17. He got game!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He already beat Djokovic so why would this be such a historic upset?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Going to be watching .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
화이팅 Chung Hyeon
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
COULD THIS BE THE PEAK OF MR FEDERERS REIGN AT THE TOP!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
played great tennis so far, but I'm gonna go with the old man Fed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Go the best player ever Roger Federer


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.