Why is 90 percent of WSJ’s social media presence devoted to hackneyed and disingenuous opinion pieces? I mean, does the social media guy not get that you actually do legitimate journalism?
-
-
-
At least it is labeled as opinion in the tweet so you know what you are getting when you click. The
@NewYorker constantly tweets headlines from opinion and satire pieces as if they are news.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is a stupid article. If you have comprehensive public care why would you not centralize all current health programs to remove redundancy and streamline operations. Regulating insurance corporations to adapt to provide new services vs free public care also removes redundancy
-
It's brazenly partisan and lacks any business acumen to decry this as crazy. A private insurer would do the same exact thing had a merger taken place. Not to mention all doctors would be forced to operate under the law so..."if you like your doctor, you can keep them."
-
This is an attempt to preserve a current healthcare landscape which are highly profitable and morally problematic & unaffordable at best. It provides a critique with no substance and no path forward. Author should be "The Armchair Quarterback for Aetna."
-
The British system permits private healthcare because the public healthcare is so shit that anyone that has the money will stay as far away from it as possible.
-
Thanks to the Tories and their austerity. They are attempting to follow US Republican leads and break the system so they can privatize.
-
No it’s actually because of the general rule that applies to all public sectors that they get chronic underfunding because they’re always too expensive. The exact same thing happened with rail. Also do you know we give away £39bn a year to service debt? If
-
I wouldn't be using the British Rail as a success story, were I you. Even Thatcher, the queen of the free market, wasn't keen on it, and it's a hardly a poster child for privatization. Looked at your profile briefly. Nice pork pies in your area. Wish we could get them in the US
-
The national rail system was one of the most chronically underfunded public institutions in history, let me find an article for you
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Which "rich old white guys" get a pass and which do not? Unfortunately, it depends on one's political allegience rather than any concept of rational, constitutional governance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even for you guys this piece written by a lobbying group in DC is utterly moronic, filled with childish insults and gross exaggerations, even the opinion section should have some form of credibility
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He wants to get rid of tricare? Is this man insane?!?!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By all means, let’s go with the dotard commie from the Great White North.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
democracy dies in darkness, eh guys?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Under
@SenSanders' system, we simply wouldn't need the old system anymore. You either didn't think this through or are deliberately trying to mislead and manipulate people. -
You’re right,we’d need a new system to deal with the crap created by Sanders’ “new” Medicare. Except,under him any supplemental insurance would be illegal
-
Of course supplemental insurance would be illegal. The rich don't deserve better healthcare just because they are rich. They say justice is blind; well, I think healthcare should be blind.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.