That’s the only context that makes sense. Come on, WSJ. You got it wrong, need to suck it up and admit it. We want to be able to continue to trust you as a source of factual news.
-
-
-
I agree. I’m no fan of Trump - far from it - but even if the word isn’t clear the intonation of his voice suggests he’s talking future tense. I’m disappointed in
@WSJ for persuing this tenuous story.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It makes no sense that he said “I’d” not I: “I have a great relationship with him, as you know I have a great relationship with Prime......
-
...Minister Abe of Japan and I probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong Un of North Korea. I have relationships with people...
-
....I think you people are surprised.” Why would he switch from present tense to future or conditional without adding a “if Un would [...]
-
It’s so odd that this is being debated. Maybe the mind is adding an “I’d” b/c otherwise trump is mistaken or misspeaking? So it adds the d.
-
Only makes sense in the context of "I'd probably say....IF this or that" . He refutes nothing after. The only thing he could say is I unless he miss spoke, which is entirely possible from the world's most stable genius with the best words.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am temporarily but nonetheless literally stupider for having read that...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“I’d” is clearly audible. Seriously, correct your story. I’ve held the Journal on a pedestal for true objective journalism. You are massively damaging your reputation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure sounds like he said “I’d”. Plus it only makes sense saying “and I’d probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong Un of North Korea.” What u didn’t include in the text are the words he immediately said next “I would”. He and everyone else knows he doesn’t have one now
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Anytime I’ve tried to read a
#trumptranscript it’s completely unreadableThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope wouldn’t read your paper
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can hear the I'd in the audio plus the context and the sentence does not make sense as you are reporting it.
#FakeNews.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it in green crayon?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's the audio for any apologists who blindly choose to believe the
#LiarInChief.#Resist#KnowledgeIsPower#BlueWave2018#DueDiligence#SaveOurFreePresshttp://www.wsj.com/video/disputed-audio-from-donald-trump-interview-with-wsj/33003B4D-0DA4-4760-B913-0C2CDC903E74.html … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.