In an era of technological connectivity we should be increasing the standard to remove the "probable cause" allowance. Not removing the need for a warrant.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are not a police state.
@ScotusThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No way! Warrants should be required! Police should be able to search when a judge agrees there is reasonable cause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-


" The Fourth Amendment protects persons,
houses, papers and effects” from “unreasonable
searches and seizures” ...
Suplimentar,amendamentul 18, ratificat în 1919,
... interzicerea producerii, vânzării și transportului
produselor ETILICE . .... -
adica PROHIBITIA, o perioada infloritoare financiar, in sprijinul grupurilor infractionale. Incepand cu perioada policroma subculturala HIPPIE, explozia folosirii DROGURILOR, in fel si chip, consecinta a ... excesului de legiferare adica, o data-n plus profit, neasteptat, ...
-
... acordat cu generozitate unor grupari infractionale, nu de putine ori caracatite intre reprezentanti cu menire publica si delicventi marginalizati de forta maniei sociale. Complicat, nu ? In conturul national USA, secolul XXI necesita relaxare NORMATIVA !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does anyone have any idea what The Constitution says anymore?!?! Clearly some on the SCOTUS need to bone up on what it says.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"All bad precedents began as justifiable measures." - Julius Caesar
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
procuring a warrant would be a real hindrance. The 4th Amendment cannot be rendered a mere form of words based on alleged "exigent circumstances" and subjective "exceptions."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given the "Wingspan" Doctrine gives police a very, very wide latitude to search vehicles with ANY occupant during an investigative stop, why can't the police wait until the occupants return? Moreover, it seems dubious that if the need to search a parked car was "that important"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ppl making these laws are the ppl that get behind the wheel of their cars and drive drunk cuz they are ABOVE the law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This right here is why law enforcement gets targeted, violation of ppl rights. Can't just search somebody's property cuz they FEEL like it. GTFOH!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bad decision
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.