Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
WSJ's profile
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
Verified account
@WSJ

Tweets

The Wall Street JournalVerified account

@WSJ

Breaking news and features from the WSJ.

New York, NY
wsj.com
Joined April 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The Wall Street Journal‏Verified account @WSJ Jan 8

    Opinion: Trump’s feckless legal threat to the publisher of Michael Wolff’s book isn’t a threat to the First Amendment http://on.wsj.com/2AI8bHy 

    5:25 PM - 8 Jan 2018
    • 34 Retweets
    • 76 Likes
    • Nikki Boudreaux Marcos Carrillo carol braziel Lisa Griffin FARZAD KIAN Francisco Javier Ber Boy Plunger Henry Morgan Lorenzo V.
    26 replies 34 retweets 76 likes
      1. John Riggins‏ @Bluetalefly1969 Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        Absolute BS from the TRUMP apologists...Kissing off reckless behavior by a failed POTUS45 😱😱😱😱

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Katrina‏ @katrinatl Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        The book is great everyone should read it!

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Rafael Olmeda‏Verified account @rolmeda Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        wow. you guys got really dumb after Murdoch bought the paper.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Rafael Olmeda‏Verified account @rolmeda Jan 8
        Replying to @rolmeda @WSJ

        When a private citizen complains about libel laws, it's bluster. When the President of the USA does it, it's an assault on the first amendment. How do you even read a newspaper, much less write for one, without knowing the difference? PAthetic.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Common Sense, Please‏ @bkroseberry Jan 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        The #FirstAmendment protects your right to say what you want, but it doesn't, however, protect you from the consequences of your words, such as #libel & #slander lawsuits.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Dan Hampson‏ @BDSEL Jan 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        The Pres of the US sent a C&D letter to a publisher because he didn't like the content of the book. I'd call that a threat.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1.  ❌Will ❌‏ @willmcdonald82 Jan 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        That’s true. Even books like “Fury of Feces” should be allowed to be read by Democrats and Libs to dumb them down even more.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. BADAPE‏ @badape Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        You lost me totally at Citizens United.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. CERA‏ @ICEINTERN Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        Such lawsuits will be thrown out of Court. It cannot be disguised as National security. Freedom of speech and Constitution first amendment of individuals will prevail.pic.twitter.com/z5G9jSvmz7

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. My President is a Stable Genius!‏ @mudyroot Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        BTW, have you heard the latest news about your journalists reporting fake Russian stories planted by some FBI Trump haters? It's kind of a big thing!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. charles warren‏ @aitepaeapaea Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        malicious lying isn't protected by #1a.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Positiveoptionsforsuccess‏ @Positiveoption1 Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        His threat increased sales of a really boring book

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Brooks A. Mick‏ @SailFree Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        It was very feck and it was not a blunder. The more Wolf’s book is used as ammo by Democrats, the less credible, the more insane, they will seem. Trump’s lawyer deliberately hyped the book by pretending to oppose.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. WV Mountain Man‏ @o0MountainMan0o Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        pic.twitter.com/KuoLwCxC8u

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Sam Baker‏ @WaterlooSam Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        bull shit!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Richard Steele‏ @Steelpilot1 Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        Of course it isn't because we have the first ammendment. Trump's threat does show what he thinks of the constitution though. He doesn't like it one bit.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Scott kramer‏ @scottkramer77 Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        Yes it is.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Tanner Raine‏ @TannerRaine Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        https://youtu.be/g2hw1z286o0 

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Elli Fights For Democracy‏ @ElliAdventurer Jan 8
        Replying to @WSJ

        How is the POTUS asking for a book not to be published NOT a risk to the first amendment? Come on, WSJ. DO BETTER.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info