In case anyone was wondering which side of the aisle @WSJ answers to, this headline alone should make it clear. #Complicit
-
-
-
They've always been, I don't know why everyone seemed to act with such shock
-
Because now it’s on Twitter. Back in the day you’d be 2 pages into insightful, centrist financial articles and they hit you with the climate change denying op-ed on page 3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Did Comcast help you write this?
-
He prob just copied and pasted the draft they wrote
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Says Murdoch-owned WSJ! How will Murdoch use this to further dismantle the US? He sells most assets EXCEPT Fox “News”. Trump has already publicly endorsed the deal. Then Murdoch hires Trump and gets the Trump zealots army to boot. Add $52 billion in cash. What could go wrong!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More money for big business. Someday we will learn that every time big business wants to stop regulations and make a smaller government it is for the capitalist to make more money and do nothing to protect the consumer. They have their hand in your pocket.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Internet is a utility. It’s essential to living. Yet this whole opinion is based on the assumption that it is not. A fatally flawed analysis
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Whoever wrote this is a delirious walnut. Yeah, sure, cable companies that sell us broadband will use this repeal to breakdown their own monopolies on content. Then we can all just switch to one of the DOZENS of broadband providers in our non-existent fantasy neighborhood.
-
I love "delirious walnut"!!!!
-
Yes. Can I steal that? I’m gonna steal that.

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We know who wrote this, jerkoff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what happens when someone who lacks an understanding of technology or software engineering writes an article about
#NetNeutrality
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Really? Is this why Comcast already changed its terms of service indicating it's intent to throttle, etc.?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.