So, essentially the House is asking us to indirectly fund political organizations (in the guise of churches) that will likely champion causes antithetical to the beliefs of many taxpayers. Um... no.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This cannot happen and we must reverse Citizens United
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@WSJ: The House tax bill would roll back the Johnson Amendment—unlike the Senate plan http://on.wsj.com/2BUgEbL pic.twitter.com/keFQwQsR7M
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then they should be fully taxed like any other business!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WTF???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This bill is full of terrible ideas. Most citizens are against it. Vote no.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love it! Make it happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be a huge mistake for any Christian church to endorse any one candidate. Jesus taught Spiritual principles not politics!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong. Churches & religious leaders should not publicly endorse political candidates. They may unduly influence their members to vote a certain way discouraging the members from voting as they want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time to tax them, then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
very bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.