Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
WSJ's profile
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
Verified account
@WSJ

Tweets

The Wall Street JournalVerified account

@WSJ

Breaking news and features from the WSJ.

New York, NY
wsj.com
Joined April 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The Wall Street Journal‏Verified account @WSJ 10 Dec 2017

    Opinion: Mueller, the Justice Department and the FBI are obstructing Congress, writes @KimStrasselhttp://on.wsj.com/2j8kQRk 

    6:00 AM - 10 Dec 2017
    • 124 Retweets
    • 220 Likes
    • Mohamad  Last Rodrigo Rodas N&JZ Ramil GOYUSHOV El Shafikh Ikechukwu Nriamah Chinecherem O AM Doddeeyy S.S.
    171 replies 124 retweets 220 likes
      1. Legal Scholar‏ @legalskolar 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        And Congress has been obstructing the American people.

        0 replies 5 retweets 38 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Mauko Hao‏ @Titasista 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        pic.twitter.com/8G2mApRtOG

        0 replies 6 retweets 27 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Greg Tucker-Kellogg‏ @gtuckerkellogg 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Thanks for the reminder of why I cancelled my subscription

        0 replies 3 retweets 32 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Mara‏ @travelgeek770 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Perhaps if Congress did their jobs & put #CountryOverParty we wouldn’t need #MuellerInvestigation! The fact that an FBI agent was REMOVED from the investigation should reassure everyone that the Mueller team is non political. Remember, Mueller kept us safe after 9/11!

        0 replies 4 retweets 23 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Chris Shelton‏ @sheltondesigner 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Et tu, WSJ? Another pathetic attempt to confuse, distract and divide the American people. This investigation is ruffling more feathers than we thought. Sad to see WSJ becoming part of the problem rather than the solution. #FollowTheMoney

        0 replies 4 retweets 20 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Kim Brachet‏ @KimBrachet 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        I remember when the WSJ was an excellent newspaper now like the Republican Party itself it has sold out it’s integrity for, well that is the real question what ever the motivation the result is a once great paper and party are now ruled by agenda over everything.

        1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes
      3. Stable Genius‏ @HurryUpMueller 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @KimBrachet @WSJ @KimStrassel

        I discovered WSJ a few months ago and was thrilled to find it to be the accurate and prestigious conservative news source I had been looking for for so long (I like hearing both sides of the story). Too bad they're trash now!

        0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. zarroff‏ @MajorZaroff 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        We really nervous about this report aren’t we?

        0 replies 1 retweet 27 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Dude the Obscure‏ @Dude_theObscure 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Sad to see the WSJ in a downward spiral to the level of @FoxNews .

        1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes
      3. Tweet unavailable
      4. Dude the Obscure‏ @Dude_theObscure 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @davidhdobson @WSJ and

        Seems like things changed about the time Murdoch bought it🤔

        0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Freedom of Speech‏ @NoPartisanUSA 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Rupert Murdoch owns both The Wall Street Journal and FOX news. Read The Onion it is more reliable.

        1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes
      3. Stable Genius‏ @HurryUpMueller 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @NoPartisanUSA @WSJ @KimStrassel

        I'm sad to hear that, I was starting to like WSJ quite a lot. They keep tweeting this stupid article though, which makes me glad I didn't buy a subscription.

        0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Jim  🌊 🌊 2112‏ @jimh_2112 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        This sounds like a poor attempt to discredit his investigation. Nice try, but no dice. Besides that, Congress is its own worst enemy. They don’t need any help obstructing themselves.

        1 reply 3 retweets 25 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. Mary Byrd‏ @MaryB505 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Congress obstructs itself.

        1 reply 1 retweet 28 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. E‏ @TeamJakeAbbey 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        @WSJ Are you part of the scheme to undermine the rule of law and underpinnings of democracy too?

        0 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. CPAP Princess 👸‏ @Eilisabel 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        How much is the 1600 Gambino family paying you for this 💩, @KimStrassel?

        0 replies 1 retweet 20 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Banshee-la Saccone‏ @SheilaSaccone 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Just because someone can string words together doesn't make them qualified to write a well researched and thoughtful opinion. If Congress hadn't mucked this up from day one - there wouldn't have been a need for Mueller.

        1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes
      3. Wendy  🌊‏ @iLovethePitties 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SheilaSaccone @WSJ @KimStrassel

        Exactly my sentiment. Opinion pieces should be researched and evaluate various positions before taking a final position. This does neither which makes it ineffective to change anyone’s mind and clickbait for the rabid trump followers. Well done @WSJ a new low for your integrity.

        1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
      4. Mike‏ @MikeH1230 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @iLovethePitties @SheilaSaccone and

        Opinions aren’t news. Just like us. Do you agree with every opinion piece? Let people have their own opinion. Opinions doesn’t have to justify both sides, news articles do. There’s a difference. Trump followers can say the same about other opinion pieces correct?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Banshee-la Saccone‏ @SheilaSaccone 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @MikeH1230 @iLovethePitties and

        Point taken - however, there is a difference as she is a columnist for @WSJ - were she simply writing a letter to the editor, there would've been no reason to comment.http://classroom.synonym.com/difference-between-editorial-letter-editor-5199.html …

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      6. Mike‏ @MikeH1230 10 Dec 2017
        Replying to @SheilaSaccone @iLovethePitties and

        Ah, point taken here too. I’ll have to use this link myself.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      7. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info