So a "Federal Judge" gave illegal aliens the right to sue the President of the United States over an unconstitutional law?!? What is that Judge's name?
-
-
-
Wait for scotus ruling .. They will all lise
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wacko Federal Judges can rule a tomato is a tiger. Nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gee a liberal Judge allows a lawsuit to go forward that cant be adjudicated.... Shocking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amazing how the lawyer elite are bringing the US to its knees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Esos jóvenes sólo piden una oportunidad sólo una..........
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Leftist judge ruling against America. What’s new?
-
.. SCOTUS will CRUSH
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No they can't because Daca Wasn't a law it was an executive order and temporary
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let me guess an Obama of Clinton appointee ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No surprise another far left liberal rules from the bench not the laws. Congress will make the laws for this next year!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when did a a federal judge obtain authority to order a president to violate the law? Since
@KenPaxtonTX quit on the job I guess someone else is going to have to step up and point out DACA was illegal.#DoesPrivateCitizenHaveStandingToBringSuit -
Tweet unavailable
-
Considering the previous administration lacked legal authority to issue the Executive Order creating
#DACA, what makes you think a judge can authorize it? -
Says who? The President had the authority to issue and mandate DACA. You can speak your ass out of your mouth all day long.
-
It doesn't matter. These are decisions taken by conservative leaning judges. Decisions not based on merit and constitutionality. Two words for you: Article II. That gives authority to both Presidents to act on DACA.
-
1) The U.S. Supreme Court upheld ending DAPA. 2) Article II doesn't grant that authority. The left leaning judge authored the opinion based on "equal protection" and admits they may ultimately lose because the Obama administration had overstepped its authority.
-
How did he overstep his authority? Suffice it to say that the Constitution and Congress together gave the Executive Office of the President the power to "make or break" things like DACA, and the Supreme Court has, for the most part, upheld the exercise of that kind of power.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.