Honestly, this looks like it may help me. The bigger question is, does it help America? I don't want a reduction if it means (1/2)
-
-
-
eliminating critical services or hurting Americans most in need. We'll see how it progresses. (2/2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What the “new taxplan” means for you. We don’t need a party attached.
-
In that case, the legislative process shouldn't have been partisan.
-
Was it, though?
-
Um, yes. Using the budget reconciliation process allows the Republicans to sidestep the Dems entirely.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/republican-obamacare-failure-tax-reform/541197/ …
-
That’s what I was inferring with my previous post. It wasn’t bi-partisan at all. I think we agree. I’m just tired of party totems.
-
People make a decision on something before they read the content, simply because of their political affiliation.
-
True, but in this case it is designed, billed, and marketed as the Republican plan. It's important for the GOP take ownership of the outcome
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This plan looks to me like married couples with two incomes earning median wage or better will get hit by higher taxes. That is middle class
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lower rates are all fine, so long as deficits are under control and we aren't cutting corners.
-
(This plan makes the deficit go even more bananas.)
-
The President should know that if the country does not do well, so will his businesses. He may face public ire too.
-
He gets it. He is a smart man.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s a lot of lost revenue. How does the government function when corporation taxes are cut like that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.