-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So...those editorials from last week are aging nicely, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn’t your editorial idiots call for Mueller’s firing?
@WSJ is not credible on anything regarding this matter.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Still think Trump can fire him?
-
not without a huge backlash
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would guess he needs more tax dollars for this so he can waste time and money.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Was this article approved by the Kochs and Mercers?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You can bet next stage ignores Clinton, DNC Russia collusion. Was the 145M kickback from Russians to Clintons reported in taxes?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wait—is this the same WSJ whose ed board a few days ago called for Mueller’s resignation? Canceled my subscription this morning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for protecting us all from our enemies foreign and domestic,i am a vet also ..GOD BLESS AMERICA,MR.Mueller
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you think it's time to end the Mueller investigation. You got on the FOX train. Sad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Proof please. They are not under investigation. Both sides of the political aisle except #45 and his cultists have all the faith in Mueller

-
your cultist is crazy with "Russia Collusion"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.