I use to read wsj. Not anymore.
-
-
-
Try to read multiple sources. Unfortunately many that are convinced it's MSM with conservative bent. Now actually promoting distorted facts.
-
Well, you have one side yelling Hillary. The other side has lawyers & proof of wrongdoing. Just sad to see in times like this the press
-
were somewhat more similar during the ‘90’s.
-
Cable Media allowing guest to promote version without clarifying if comments true just as bad. That works for both sides of the story
-
That’s a perfect example of an opinion not a fact. Anyone can have one of those.
-
know someone locally that saw it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Remember when Rupert Murdoch bought the WSJ and said he wouldn’t interfere? Yeah, right.
-
Anything Murdoch owns immediately ceases to be "media" and becomes propaganda outlet.
-
I cancelled my subscription to National Geographic when he bought it, I'd been a subscriber for 30 years.
-
I didn't realize that was one of his. What a disappointing moment I am having right now. Haha. So conflicted.
-
My parents were subscribers for over 60 years, my uncle owned some of the very first issues. It wasn't easy, I cried a after I cancelled.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe next you can publish an article about the relationship between Trump, Murdoch (owner of WJS), & Roy Cohn. You're not biased, right?
-
WSJ. Shame shame shame
-
WSJ: We will embrace outright propaganda, disinformation and lies so long as we can get our tax cuts! Must save the tax cuts!!!

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So irresponsible. I wonder if he got an extra bonus for writing this nonsense.
-
-
True. True!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.