So what happened in Kansas? What specific part of the Trump tax cut plan is going to create a boom in growth where Kansas’s approach so clearly didn’t?
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Every single time the
@GOP promises cutting taxes pays for itself by encouraging capital investment. Every time they have been wrong. -
The GOP keeps running the same trickle down
#TaxScam and the rubes keep falling for it. Buy a lottery ticket, the odds are better. -
I get it, it looks great on paper. But so does Communism.
-
The GOP has built their entire agenda around feeding the greed of the super wealthy. When they're finished this will be a good job.pic.twitter.com/RrzJPVVez8
-
Exactly. These economists always fail to remind you under Reagan all incentives for capital investment were shredded.
-
Always wonder who is less accountable for accurate predictions, economists or meteorologists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lmao fuck the Wall Street journal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kevin Hassett is an embarrassment and a dishonest political operative. Hassett can’t defend his plan and is so inarticulate he sounds loony.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I find it laughable that the same people that question the validity of the benefit of lower corporate taxes as "trickle down nonsense" are cheerleaders for the clown show of "Keynesian economics" that prints a $10TT bill to the taxpayers and creates largest wealth gap in history
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Common sense...if America charges over double taxes for companies than any other country, they will move and take the jobs with them.
-
Sure, this would be common sense if it were true.
-
Ok Luke. Keep listening to Keynesians like
@paulkrugman who basically endorse slave labor overseas and outright theft of fake fed money -
I'm not arguing Keynesian economics, I'm saying our effective rate is not "double" anything and we have one of lowest tax revenues per GDP.
-
Lefties seem to conveniently ignore the secondary/tertiary revenues that come from higher employment as well as saved from social subsidies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Much of that investment will go to increase worker productivity” Automation? Fewer jobs, that may pay better. Shareholders will profit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.