Oh, for a second I thought it meant intellectual diversity. So they are just going to go all sexist and racist. I see.
-
-
-
GOing to hire people based on their race or gender, not on their qualifications. Ok, whatever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait a sec, how? Race based hiring? #1984
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about political diversity? Or do they just care about skin color?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because hiring based on race instead of qualifications makes sense....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Guessing diversify means get rid of the liberals and bring in the progressives? I would say conservatives but sure non are there. Comical!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why does it cost so much? Just hire qualified people--period.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What a waste of money. How about offsetting rising tuition costs?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Diversifying ... as they see fit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't it offensive that the only comment Columbia had on hiring women is that they needed $ to hire their spouses too?
-
$100M speaks for itself!
-
It's possible to be well intentioned but still entirely miss the cause of a problem. Our diversity problem has little to do with money.
-
Columbia has lots of money, but priorities need shifting. Devoting $ to a problem doesn't in and of itself signal any change in priorities.
-
On the contrary, money is the only real signal of a change in priorities!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.