This is so ignorant. Education is key
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, they should cut the funding to abstinence-only programs that have 0 positive effect, and result in increased pregnancy rates & STIs.
-
This was... seriously one of the worst takes I've seen come out of WSJ, and that's saying something.
-
And I think the author KNOWS this, and that is why they chose to publish under "The Editorial Board" instead of their name.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where would you like to out it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PORNHUB AND THE INTERNET HAS SEX-ED COVERED!! NO NEED TO PUT OUT GOVERNMENT $$$ FOR IT!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, abstinence only education has been a complete success.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Tweet unavailable
-
This is a WSJ editorial. They hate sex ed in general, but it works. I wouldn't trust their description anymore than you would NY Times.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now for that pesky $700B defense budget. How's that working for us?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.