Opinion: Even WSJ readers have a reason to be skeptical of a FOX contributer who'll say anything he's paid to.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science doesn't care what you believe#fuckalternativefacts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ClimateFdbk Please scientifically doublecheck this propaganda garbage and add the facts... -
Ah, you must be one of the anti climate change Mercer bots I heard so much about...
-
Climate change denier bots, to be more precise...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So called climate change has become a boondoggle for greedy politicians ready to take advantage of ignorant people!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good article,
@WSJ and@FreemanWSJThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, they don't. How much more goddamn proof do you need?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think they must pass an IQ test and have a scientific degree 2 or else I, a scientist writer, could just write an article like this 2 U.
-
Why wait for one man? Do it yourself. If u think it's important, be a doer not a pointer at others 2 do for u. Get beads from your ears.

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The climate change debate has been settled. Journalistic integrity on the issue clearly has not.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.