Excellent article. 
-
-
-
Except that it displays a lack of understanding of some fundamental facts.
-
Like the fact that we know the change of average global temperature to much higher precision than it's absolute value.
-
Lacking an understanding of fundamental facts but giving air time to science rejection narratives in a mainstream pub *defines* "excellent".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(3) yearly averages of 2014, 2015, 2016 surpass the 20th century average by more than 1.5 degrees. This is not hard to understand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, that was a painful read. Full frontal labotomy recommended before proceeding. Thankfully most content hidden behind a pay wall.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(4) What IS hard to understand is why this poorly written & argued piece is being promoted as a finger wagger that should cause chagrin....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I find it hard to believe the author has a fundamental grasp of the topic when he states 'burning carbon' in the second paragraph. Smdh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe you guys should try letting scientists write your climate change pieces
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Idiotic article. But it's the WSJ and climate change, so par for the course I guess. Oh and BTW, the facts:pic.twitter.com/4jgq7kGQxG
-
That's fiction
-
You're fictional. (Gosh, that's fun.)
-
No I'm not, That is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why do people listen to ignorant science denial from non scientists?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(5) To wag with authority and effect, the finger must know what the hell it's doing. This article does not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(1) This article misses the point of the study it links to. The NYT reports the temps are higher than the average temp for the entire ....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When the history of the 21st c. is written, certain malevolent actors will stand out as clear villains: FOX, the WSJ, CNBC, Forbes, et al
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(2)20th century, not just a random 30 year period of it. The studies are saying that given 100 years of average temps, the new ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The recent break off of a 1 Trillion ton iceberg and the 8th of 12 ice shelves about to go should make everyone pause.
-
And that was caused by AGW/CC?
-
Just a hunch but if the highest earth temps recorded all happened during the 20th century; aint happening because somebody opened a freezer
-
Maybe has something to do with exiting an ice age?
-
In my opinion .... It's more than a coincidence that the acceleration has come just as the industrial revolution began
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.