Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
WSJ's profile
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
Verified account
@WSJ

Tweets

The Wall Street JournalVerified account

@WSJ

Breaking news and features from the WSJ.

New York, NY
wsj.com
Joined April 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The Wall Street Journal‏Verified account @WSJ 19 Jul 2017

    Opinion: Even New York Times readers have reason to be skeptical on climate change, writes @FreemanWSJhttp://on.wsj.com/2tggTtS 

    1:54 PM - 19 Jul 2017
    • 45 Retweets
    • 64 Likes
    • Matthew O'Connell Kris Booonderic, PhD 👨‍🔬 Rod Paez Davison Luke Slade Randy Lawson PM Jeffrey Batchelor numa perseu mahas Don Pépito
    21 replies 45 retweets 64 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Climate News‏ @ClimateNewsCA 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Excellent article. 👍

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Johannes Riecke‏ @JohannesRiecke 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @ClimateNewsCA @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Except that it displays a lack of understanding of some fundamental facts.

        3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
      4. Johannes Riecke‏ @JohannesRiecke 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @JohannesRiecke @ClimateNewsCA and

        Like the fact that we know the change of average global temperature to much higher precision than it's absolute value.

        2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes
      5. Geoff Price‏ @geoffmprice 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @JohannesRiecke @ClimateNewsCA and

        Lacking an understanding of fundamental facts but giving air time to science rejection narratives in a mainstream pub *defines* "excellent".

        0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
      6. End of conversation
      1. Harcourt Fenton Mudd‏ @HFentonMudd 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        (3) yearly averages of 2014, 2015, 2016 surpass the 20th century average by more than 1.5 degrees. This is not hard to understand.

        0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Joseph Curtin‏ @jmcurtin 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Wow, that was a painful read. Full frontal labotomy recommended before proceeding. Thankfully most content hidden behind a pay wall.

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Harcourt Fenton Mudd‏ @HFentonMudd 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        (4) What IS hard to understand is why this poorly written & argued piece is being promoted as a finger wagger that should cause chagrin....

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. j‏ @inv3rarity 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        I find it hard to believe the author has a fundamental grasp of the topic when he states 'burning carbon' in the second paragraph. Smdh.

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. bort‏ @Bort2020 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Maybe you guys should try letting scientists write your climate change pieces

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Mark W‏ @B9lyEquivocal 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Idiotic article. But it's the WSJ and climate change, so par for the course I guess. Oh and BTW, the facts:pic.twitter.com/4jgq7kGQxG

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. MichaelCrow‏ @Michael_D_Crow 22 Jul 2017
        Replying to @B9lyEquivocal @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        That's fiction

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Mark W‏ @B9lyEquivocal 22 Jul 2017
        Replying to @Michael_D_Crow @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        You're fictional. (Gosh, that's fun.)

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      5. MichaelCrow‏ @Michael_D_Crow 22 Jul 2017
        Replying to @B9lyEquivocal @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        No I'm not, That is.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      6. End of conversation
      1. Speculawyer  🇳🇴-American‏ @speculawyer 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Why do people listen to ignorant science denial from non scientists?

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Harcourt Fenton Mudd‏ @HFentonMudd 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        (5) To wag with authority and effect, the finger must know what the hell it's doing. This article does not.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Harcourt Fenton Mudd‏ @HFentonMudd 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        (1) This article misses the point of the study it links to. The NYT reports the temps are higher than the average temp for the entire ....

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Mark W‏ @B9lyEquivocal 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        When the history of the 21st c. is written, certain malevolent actors will stand out as clear villains: FOX, the WSJ, CNBC, Forbes, et al

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Harcourt Fenton Mudd‏ @HFentonMudd 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        (2)20th century, not just a random 30 year period of it. The studies are saying that given 100 years of average temps, the new ...

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Scruples5‏ @Scruples5 19 Jul 2017
        Replying to @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        The recent break off of a 1 Trillion ton iceberg and the 8th of 12 ice shelves about to go should make everyone pause.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      3. Dusty Bottoms‏ @el_guapo001 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @Scruples5 @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        And that was caused by AGW/CC?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Scruples5‏ @Scruples5 21 Jul 2017
        Replying to @el_guapo001 @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Just a hunch but if the highest earth temps recorded all happened during the 20th century; aint happening because somebody opened a freezer

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Dusty Bottoms‏ @el_guapo001 22 Jul 2017
        Replying to @Scruples5 @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        Maybe has something to do with exiting an ice age?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      6. Scruples5‏ @Scruples5 23 Jul 2017
        Replying to @el_guapo001 @WSJ @FreemanWSJ

        In my opinion .... It's more than a coincidence that the acceleration has come just as the industrial revolution began

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info