"Reducing the number of hands the story has to pass through" means "eliminating copy editors," I'm guessing. Following the NYT's lead, eh?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only reasons I didn't take up WSJ $1 for 2mths print sub is (1) offer too good, don't want to impoverish WSJ; (2) petty thefts nearby
-
I'll surely sub WSJ again when I'm doing better (knock wood).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here is an updated compilation to begin the process of bloodlines in an enclosed space
...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you make a War Correspondent? Or another social media website reporter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suspect that the WSJ now plans to become THE NEW YORK TIMES 2.0
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://goo.gl/z3cGhL Very well. You can access this link to see something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.