I don't understand. The @WSJ published content that is potentially negative for team Trump. Does this mean the WSJ is now fake news too?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh oh Donny, get out your firing pen!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...until i get confirmed and change my mind and laugh on how i played everyone"

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because… he is. The Democrats still have nothing. And their entire position is predicated on the 80’s sentiment: Russia = Evil. LOL.
-
Because Russia = evil. Limited freedoms, murdering journalists, supporting dictators like al-Assad, annexing sovereign nations, what's left?
-
So are they the most evil? Or would say, Saudi Arabia be more evil. I’m just wondering because they supported Shillary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The criminal always thinks it's a witch hunt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He came off very dishonest and weaselly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He has to say that to get the job. Only then can he round up the coup plotters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"More specifically, he's on a god-emperor hunt. I don't believe in witches"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.