-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wall Street Journal, Sources? Proof of conversation that you're implying occurred? Be careful. See
@CNN lately? -
What are you even talking about? Jr acknowledged the meeting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-

does this mean u still dont have valid proof of "Russia hacking the elections" its been almost a year now. Speculation is not proof -
FAKE NEWS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What would the press say if "Chelsea Clinton met with Russian officials that apparently had damaging information on Donald Trump"? Good girl
-
Try again. We would condemn her.
#CountryOverParty -
I don't see it as wrong. If someone had valid proof of crimes on an opponent who wants to be president - do it. I wouldn't blame either side
-
I'm as pro-Trump as they come, but I would want him to resign if he really colluded - didn't. Same as I want Hillary to pay for her crimes.
-
Then you are in for a ride...buckle up.
-
Yep: Spying/Unmasking Scandal, Lynch Obstruction Scandal, Classified Leaks Scandal. There's nothing on Trump but plenty on the Dems.
-
Haven't seen a single conviction though. Plenty of hearings. Plenty dirt on everyone.
-
They have been desperately looking for a year & found zero on Trump. Just now looking at all the Obama corruption with real subpoenas sent
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Poor bugger a head full of straw a dad who makes him jump these are crooks plain and simple a real man would have stood up for right .pic.twitter.com/vfP6h7IvOi
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what? Hillary got 140 million for US Uranium!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.