-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because they have gerrymandered districts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No need for that; more money poured into the winner than the loser! This isn't ideology it's finance! Dormez vous? Under disguise!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL. Not if the Ds pick up 18 points in every district. Leave it to the WSJ to give unbiased POV.
-
That being said, the ruling party has plenty of time to rig the elections they need to rig where they control the voting machinery.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
WSJ is owned by Republicans, why should Dems take WSJ's advice?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It was a seat they considered "safe" but had to pour millions into......???
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
McConnell the south will rise again!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They still don't get it.
@realDonaldTrump more popular than congressional Republicans are! They should be on#TrumpTrain if they want to winThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A +40 R seat became a tooth and nail fight that the Rs had to spend big and fight for. That's the lesson. Bodes very badly for closer seats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doubts created by the media ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Come on Dems focus on leadership and platform it's hard but can't rely on investigation to bring about change it's candidates and message
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.