This is a really remarkably lazy take that touches on some very complex issues (behavorial economics) without properly explaining how it...
-
-
-
...applies to the supposed point being made. Which, as you read, there doesn't appear to actually be a point being made.
-
Honestly not work I would expect to find in the Journal. Let alone work so actively promoted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this what passes for analysis these days at WSJ? Does
@HolmanJenkins have access to non public evidence that begat 5 investigations?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Comrade Trump thanks you for your service. Here, have some chocolate cake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this guy off his nut
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The investigation had just begun! Next up.... Indictments against the Russian-Republicans Traitors!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WSJ is getting as bad as FOX. Subscription already cancelled.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the dems continue this action can the people take action against them for obstruction of the President. With interest from. 1st day.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this guy really needs to stick with writing op ed's r/t business...why would WSJ allow such dribble
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.