This is definitely a sad day in America. The Divisive Issues are now in his hands, but it is not going to turn out very well. #LostHope 



-
-
-
It's a sad day for people who prefer their own subjective feelings over the rule of law
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is another sad day, one in a recent long string of sad days, for America.
-
Just gives you something else to cry about I guess? How exactly does this pick make you sad?
-
Because it was stolen. Merrick Garland never even got a hearing. Unprecedented and, frankly, disgustingly cynical politics by McConnell, R's
-
But that's how the senate works. That's the rules of a filibuster. Why would Rep. want O getting another SCOTUS pick with 1 year left?
-
........you do realize how long a presidential term is, right? And how in comparison, 1 year is quite a long time? Concerned for you, Vince.
-
Yes. 4 years. And Obama appointed 2 judges already. Why would they want him getting a 3rd when they have the right to filibuster??
-
I never knew there was a limit...
-
I didn't say there was a limit, did I? I'm simply stating that republicans had the ability to block a THIRD justice appointment.
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Stolen seat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gorsuch will always be the one who violated the constitution himself by taking a stolen seat. SHAMEFUL
-
No he did not violate constitution. McConnell and GOP used despicable measures to obtain seat.Gorsuch was their pawn.




-
McConnell violated constitution refusing to vote on Garland. Gorsuch accepted seat, like accepting stolen property.
-
How exactly did they violate the constitution?? Do you know what you're talking about?
-
article II, Section 2, clause 2, McConnell refused to follow the procedure, charges should be filed
-
The Dems created the nuke option... nothing done was criminal... quite far from it.
-
that's another issue, McConnell violated constitution refusing to vote on Garland
-
Neither Article II, nor Article III require that the Senate even grant a hearing to a presidential nomine
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.