Why write this assertion as an opinion piece? If there are supporting evidence & sources why is this just an op-ed?
-
-
-
Because they're hoping that, like a lot of Americans, the readers won't be able to tell the difference between opinion and hard newswriting.
-
I know. It sucks but it works. People fall for it again and again.
-
That being said, opinion pieces *should* be informed by facts, but this column seems rather fuzzy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Obama Administration had every right to investigate Russian interference in a US election, especially if the evidence led to Trump.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Lawrence Lie by Strassel & WSJ. Trump staffers merely found ORIGINAL PRE-masked raw transcripts & claimed "unmasking"...serious lie.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The evidence for this is .... Nunes desperately trying to deflect from
#TrumpRussia on behalf of the WH? Thanks for the red herring WSJ! -
Is
@KimStrassel aware that Nunes described the intel he'd seen as legal? This means Trump team in constant contact with legit targets. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If you call covering their ass to make sure our Govt doesn't get conpletely screwed by Trump & his lying & scheming way spying...fine by me!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And today Trumpanzees will give WSJ a pass on “Fake News” accusations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@nytimes Lie by Strassel & WSJ. Trump staffers have merely gone to ORIGINAL PRE-masked raw transcripts & claimed "unmasking"...serious lieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Keep in mind that the author of this opinion piece is a staunch Republican.
-
Yes, but the WSJ usually has a *little* more credibility. . . . .this is a bunch of hogwash.
-
They are going further and further downhill as more of Murdoch's people take over.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
HAPPY APRIL FOOLS DAY!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If it was, there was legal cause, which is surely a big thing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.