Someone breaks into my house and I have to pay for his defense lawyer? Uh, no.
-
-
-
It says they DON'T have a right to legal representation.

-
After this ruling, yes. How did any American court decide otherwise?
-
Well you know who packed tge courts with 93 "so-called" judges of which Bush only replaced like TWO: Clinton! Been a MILL the 90's
-
*since the '90s.
-
Exactly prop needs to unwind 20 years of bad judges liberal pieces of garbage who have killed our Constitution
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
no kidding- last I checked we are a sovereign nation-try demanding rights in other countries without proper documentation
-
"we are a nation of immigrants and we are nation of laws" circa President Clinton '95-President Obama '04
-
Our tax money needs to be spent on American Citizens. We our facing a huge homeless crisis throughout the country.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Uh, I believe this ruling would follow under the largely unheard of No Shit Rule?
-
Not follow under, rather fall under. Silly wine.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
From now on illegals enter at their own risk.
#tcot .@WSJ@takingitall2000https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/830585425370763264 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
finally a sensible fair ruling. Let the illegals complain to the Mexican consulate for defense.

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
that's just basic logic
-
Logic? And what drove the 9th Cir to allow dangerous people in?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.