Interesting analysis of a delicate subject that concerns to all of us when we plan to retire.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They portray low earners leeching off the system when in fact it was built to help them.
#Irresponsible -
BS. It is/was sold as savings. What it really is - govt taking what u earned & giving to somebody who didn't
-
"high earners don't benefit as much" which means they still benefit. Not as big of wealth transfer as you think.
-
Avg return is 2-3%. Or, half what you'd expect over a lifetime if you invested yourself. That's a big taking.
-
Well they could cover it better if they government did not spend $1.5 trillion on corporate welfare.
-
I may agree w/ corporate welfare comment, but if UR just saying allowing Cos. to keep what they earn, not so much.
-
Cos = companies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I really have an issue with how right wingers try and skew the information on the SS issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So low earners benefit more than high earners from social security. Wasn't that the point?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#xijinping@XHNews@PDChina#泛亚 [明鏡新聞網]泛亚苦主检察院递诉求:青海检方认可和同情 - 明镜博客 - http://go.shr.lc/2ekZR5j https://twitter.com/fy088/status/794505256612687872/photo/1pic.twitter.com/Esyf2HiJRxThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2016年11月4日 07:28 明镜邮报、明镜新闻苹果版App、明镜新闻安卓版App、中国民报、政经杂志社报道:雲南納稅100強企業 泛亞名列第87位 http://dlvr.it/Mb9qDD pic.twitter.com/p1U8nrEAP6
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

