.@WSJ Not if they are still alive.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
only if they are dead too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not unless they're dead.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
gonecrazy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes if on an ancient Indian cemetery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YES a lot of people can't even have children they are my children it shouldn't bother anybody else around us so yes Its normal its fine
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Should WSJ waste time on articles like this when they should be keeping their focus on the world economy?
#offtopic#anythingforviewsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not? Pets of Egyptian pharaohs were?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As long as they're both dead, s'ok with me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is this for real a serious issue/?.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure. Animals respect life more than some humans
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only if they're dead...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why not!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would you want Rover to nibble on your corpse?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.