@WSJ Very misleading title. #FeelTheBernpic.twitter.com/sg8pXFjldx
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@WSJ Very misleading title. #FeelTheBernpic.twitter.com/sg8pXFjldx
@WSJ and this is why I won't vote for him. I pay enough.
@senoritav76 @WSJ you make over $1 million/year.? ..read the article..anyone who makes $250,000 or less will see NO tax increases...
@janedmunds @WSJ Did you read the article? Every bracket will pay more. I don't want to pay $5 more. If u do, have at it.
@senoritav76 @WSJ yes, I would be willing to pay $5 more in taxes if it meant healthcare for all...it is the humane thing to do
@janedmunds @WSJ good for you. You have no idea how much I pay in taxes or what my situation is. So go on and pat yourself on the back. 
@senoritav76 @WSJ you probably pay nada
@WSJ stop fear mongering, look up facts! Aren't you supposed to be reputable? I guess not. Here is his actual prop.pic.twitter.com/dKTptHkV6P
@WSJ so yeah you might pay more wallstreet journal but I sure as hell wont
@M_Martone1 @WSJ When the richest family in america has more money than 160 million families, something needs to be done.
@WSJ Isn't this misleading as it wouldn't be doing that for those making less that $250,000 a year and not that much for those making $1 mil
@WSJ What an irresponsible headline!!
Honestly, America wake the hell up!
The *working class* and *middle class* would be MUCH BETTER OFF!
@WSJ Your title is disingenous...Thanks a lot for continuing to dumb down America..It's incorrect and needs to be taken down.
@PremiereBAgency @WSJ HRC also plans on asking the rich to pay more...get real
@WSJ That's it? Is that for companies that pay 0% in taxes because of offshore accounts and loopholes?
@saramarie1987 @WSJ No, that's for the working man that keeps this country afloat. Career politician Bern would burn us down.
@tommy2tips @WSJ No, I've seen the numbers and that is simply nonfactual. I don't put too much stock in Murdoch's WSJ numbers anyways.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.