-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ labor participation rate still at a 50 year low? Need some context. Thanks. -
@TWallack@WSJ@digiphile appreciate the empirical data..13 year labor participation rates would provide relevant context.13 months doesn't
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Calling bullshit...just saying...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ hey math genius, how is this good when 278k Lost their jobs.....during same period. We need 450k at least to be meaningful.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ 4.9%, if you don't count over 90 million people who have given up looking for a job. Can't trust any numbers from the Obama admin!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ What a peculiar choice of photo to illustrate added US jobs: two Mexicans carrying a large flat box = gainfully employed Americans.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ what is the REAL unemployment rate? ...10%Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ..note the picture..no hard hats on..illegal labor in nyc ..more great progressThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ..fast food restaurants lost 241k the month before..great progress.Obama economy ..great jobs..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ all these numbers are inflated to make it all look better to the American people. This is why the up raising is coming.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ..IBM just announced layoffs was this factored in to the jobs report?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.