@WSJ It is intellectually dishonest to report super delegate counts this early, especially hiding the truth behind a barely legible footnote
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yo, if
@HillaryClinton is that favored, people are not paying attention. I'll never forget Ambassador Stevens.@WSJ -
If you trust her with your government after she deleted her email sever
@HillaryClinton then yeah, >_>@WSJ
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ I don't live in the US so I don't fully understand the voting system, but if Democrats have more delegates, how can Republicans win? -
@joseqzd Right now the parties aren't competing with each other, they're just picking their own nominees at the same time in similar fashion
-
@Ndstumme ok, but once each party has their nominee, Demos will have a higher number of delegates than Reps right? So what happens then? -
@joseqzd These delegates only matter now. After nomination their purpose is served. General election has a different set of delegates. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ You must have zero shame when it comes to being misleadingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Can people stop counting Superdelagates for Hillary? They have never decided a primary, only discouraged the people from showing up.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Why the hell are you adding Superdelegates? What a sleeze-bag way to support your candidate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ interesting graph designed to make hilarity look superior?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ What kind of an idiot is voting for#HillaryClinton? This woman is a mess.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ - The PLEDGED count is Clinton 91, Bernie 65. Superdelegates are UNPLEDGED until July. It's very misleading to include them this early.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ - Why show the superdelegate count, given that THEY CAN SWITCH up until July? How incredibly misleading and corporate media of you!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Maybe don't include super-delegates (Since they're only distributed at the end anyway) to make it look like clinton has a massive lead? -
@WSJ i mean, it's weird that the only person on the list with a super-delegate projection is Clinton, right? So why include it at all? -
@WSJ Don't worry, you don't have to answer, it's a rhetorical question. We both know why you would do that :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.