-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Stop the nonsense! Would you have predicted in 1975"Red China' w 1.1 billion agrarian pop would have a $10T "urban" economy in 2016?!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I can see the US Is doing it's best to reduce the population. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“
@WSJ: By 2050, there will be nearly 10 billion people on Earth, but just 13% will be in high-income countries: http://on.wsj.com/1TvrSq6 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ population growth tied to climatechange; more consumption of resources, more pollution.... something has to give.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ UR statblind. Our unemployment rate is "low" because of those no longer counted when their benefits ran out. They're still unemployed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ did you take in account Planned ParenthoodThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ https://youtu.be/m56Xm5Kmyy4 if we don't stop the Arms sales it would be half the populationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
@FiscalTweets@WSJ@greg_ip a little bit selfish don't u think? -
@marvule if you want to be naive, sure
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.