@WSJ Advancing someone merely based on gender is illegal.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ @dlouistarver advancing the right person should be the priority!!! Gender should not be a factor!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ normally you might expect the boss to advance the most qualified candidateThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yesterday's
@WSJ has focus on business women. Only 1/3 say advancing women is priority for their boss http://on.wsj.com/1M29Oyu#WSJWomenInThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ how about promoting based upon ability and merit instead of genitals? How about that?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Here we go again, I just love these dumb gender points. Let's ignore qualification etc., so we have something to talk about. So stupidThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ the "priority" of employers should be to run a successful business, not to use gender or race to discriminate - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ It's sexist to prioritize "advancing women". CEO's should promote parity based on years of experience, skill set & talent. Not sex.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I wonder what the percentage for advancing minorities.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.