-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I don't know what's more offensive... This tweet or the actual tweet... -
@ChengUSMC@WSJ Why would this tweet be offensive? -
@Undetermined_US@WSJ and when it is used, it's largely toward Asians. It becomes very difficult to over look and assume no ill intention -
@ChengUSMC@WSJ The idiom, a common one, is "chink in his armor". They used that idiom concerning an Asian. That was the mistake.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ this explanation is as bad as your racial slur - you speak as if this is no big deal. WSJ you need come up with something betterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@WSJ: We recently removed a tweet on our Xi Jinping article because a common idiom used might be seen as a slur. No offense was intended.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Common Idiom?! Really? “
@WSJ: We recently removed a tweet on our Xi Jinping article because a common idiom used might be seen as a slur.” -
@DeiFrankOne what was the idiom? -
@DeiFrankOne when was that ever an idiom? That is just a racial slur. Argh why can't press just apologise sincerely. Assholes. -
@MsDeeGee@DeiFrankOne "chink in his armor" is an idiom. It means a weakness. Not related to racial slur. -
@DJBentley@MsDeeGee@DeiFrankOne Give me a break. It was intentional, and definitely not funny in 2015. Hell, it wasn't funny in 1955.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

