@WSJ “local impact” is enough to damage communities and individual citizens
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Can we really believe this ? How do we know? We will know in another 30-40 years. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@WestTexasDust@WSJ I know@WestTexasDust. Fracking been going on for a lot longer than most realize. & let's face it : we need the gas/oil.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“
@WSJ: Fracking has no "widespread" impact on drinking water, EPA study finds. http://on.wsj.com/1KHzamb ” . Help yourself to tainted well waterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Of course it doesn't. When it occurs it is a localised event. Add them up though... ...!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@EPA doubt ? But à Study (oct 2014) prove tracability#fracking fluids in environnement http://nofrackingfrance.fr/12820-12820 -
@NoFrackFrance We don't need#EPA ! since oct 2014 : NEW TRACERS CAN IDENTIFY#FRACKING FLUIDS IN THE ENVIRONMENT! https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/new-tracers-can-identify-fracking-fluids-envi …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Surprised Obama and Josh Ernest were not shouting the good news from roof tops, huh ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@RobinRivaton Congratulations to the EPA: not inhibited by the "politically correct"! Re Fracking and Water quality.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ uh-huhThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.