@WSJ I do wish we didn't use the word "wives" - they were rape victims and slaves. Not the same thing.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ *gag* did the Wall Street Journal really just call rape victims "wives"!! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ What they have done will not go unnoticed... http://weatheryoubelieveitornot.com/ -
@DaviHoly2186@WSJ ..it's been widely noticed....sooooo?????? They're still not destroyed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ بوكو حرام ايه وزفت ايه ؟ هل انتم غير قادرين على ابادتهم ؟ امريكا الان فى حجم صغير جدا" امام العالم كله .بسبب سياستها الضعيفةThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ no one deserves to go through such trauma.. ,Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@patmcgroarty "Serving as wives"? That's an interesting euphemism. -
@altisidora11@WSJ@patmcgroarty It means sex slave/housekeeper/captive -
@gloriarangott1@WSJ@patmcgroarty Exactly. I'm not sure why the WSJ is calling them wives when they were sex slaves.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.